Kender Uncensored
Sitemeter
Contributors
Send Me $
Recent Comments
Top Commenters
The Imaginary Book
The Drunk Scotsman
The Scotsman
Uncle Kender
Favorites Buzz
-
-
What I'm Raeding Today14 years ago
-
-
.10 years ago
-
-
-
Those Whom The Gods Wish To Destroy ...7 years ago
-
If You Don't Change Your RSS Feed...14 years ago
-
-
Ministry11 years ago
-
Lacuna4 years ago
-
-
Petition to Stop Judicial Tyranny19 years ago
-
tazmedic12 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
America's New Diet15 years ago
-
Labels
- hate crimes (1)
- illegal immigration (1)
- May 1st march (1)
- muzzies (1)
- poetry (59)
- pork (1)
- stupid (1)
Gimme some love
Technorati
Warning Will Robinson!
Feel free to post comments, rants, or even personal attacks. It simply shows your wish for taunting if you do the latter.
You can say anything you want here. But if you get stupid I reserve the right to point it out, call you lots of inventive names and laugh like hell.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(371)
-
▼
November
(26)
- The War on Christmas
- Guard our borders blogburst
- Strange Twist in the Padilla Case
- What is a veteran?
- Thanksgiving Stop The ACLU Blogburst
- WARNING!!!!! WHINY BITCHY ATHEISTS WITH NOTHING ...
- 9th Circus Court
- I have Always thought that the Morons at Kos are A...
- You May Notice a Slight Change.....
- A Soldier Goes To War
- ACLU's War Against National Security
- Stop The ACLU Interviews Instapundit
- 2,000 Raging Muslims
- It is Veteran's Day
- Top Ten List of Reasons To Stop The ACLU
- Voter in California are Idiots....
- Free Jack Idema Blogburst (next week it'll cost ya...
- Yet Another Parody Song
- Trollshed Revisited
- The Devolution of France, or Pride Goeth Before th...
- ANWR, Caribou and Bears, Oh Yum!!!!
- 2018 A.D.
- One of My All Time Favorite Songs
- Parents No Longer
- The Stop the ACLU Rant
- Kender Reacts Quickly
-
▼
November
(26)
Blogs I Like
In no particular order):
Note: "right" either means this blogger is correct or that they lean right. I know what I mean by it. How do you take it?
Note: "right" either means this blogger is correct or that they lean right. I know what I mean by it. How do you take it?
- RG in The Low Country!(Right)
- Mackers World(Right)
- Ric and Georgina at Release The Hounds!(Right)
- RN at Dead Republican Presidents!
(Right) - Kat, sometimes in pajamas!
- Madtom at ThisFuckingWar! (Right)
- Michael J. Totten sets things straight!(Right)
- Maxedoutmama is a research Goddess!(Right)
- Andrightlyso! smacks on idiots!(Right)
- Where's Your Brain?(Right)
- Warm'n'fuzzy conserva-puppies>(Right)
- Crymeariverbend2 has a gnarly truth stick!(Right)
- Jeffrey at IBC is HQ for Iraqi bloggings(Right)
- The Sandmonkey cuts through the APU!(Right)
- The Lone Ranger
A Man of Rare Integrity! (Right) - Out of the Ashes(Right)
- Tazmedic(Right) (Read the archives!)
- Amandarin(Right) (A clever friend from the other side of the street)
- Literal Lunacy
A Most Beloved Friend!
(Right)
The Other Side Of The Street
Iraqi Blogs
- Iraq the Model
- Ali returns!!!
- Raeds Place
(This is where I go when I want to piss off some insane "Unrealists". Thanks CMAR!) - Khalid Digging for Secrets!
- Kurdo's World
- Baghdad Burning
(The infamous, the mysterious, the mostly hysterical Riverbend!!!!)
101st Fighting Keyboardists
The Wide Awakes
I have Always thought that the Morons at Kos are A Bunch of, well Morons.
11/18/2005 |
Posted by
kender |
Edit Post
But now I have some proof. I stopped over there a bit ago in the middle of watching CSPAN and the unfolding drama that called the Dems out on the carpet regarding their positions on the war.
Over at the Pile Of Shit, or the Daily POS as some know it by, was this "gem" of wrong-headed analysis.
Here is why this shows, without one shred of doubt, why the poster, "armando" is a blathering moron with the IQ of a turnip.
The goal of this Resolution was to allow the Dems to follow through with all of the rhetoric they spew about "supporting the troops but not the war", to give them a chance to finally "put their money where their mouths are" so to speak. It was, after all, an idea thought up by a Democrat, (the withdrawal, not nailing the Dems to the door of the Capitol Building), and after months of hearing all of the BS from the left the GOP finally found their spine and called them on it.
The vote that Armando wrote about here was the vote to decide if the measure went to the floor for debate. Of course the Dems voted "NAY". They didn't want that Resolution on the floor for debate. They wanted that Resolution forgotten about. It made them look bad.
As well it should. When it came down to it even the Dems that stood up and said they would vote YEA on the Resolution voted Nay, as the progressive Black Caucus Chair swore he would vote to bring the troops home, and with his 43 members we see that he didn't get the job done, since the had a grand total of THREE YEA votes.
The Dems had two choices here if they didn't stop the Resolution from making it to the floor, which of course they didn't. Their two choices were, vote Yea on the Resolution, showing the world, their constituencies and most importantly the Military who the true cowards are, or vote Nay, making them appear strong on defense, but, more importantly finally giving the world solid proof that even though they say they are against the war, the Dems do NOT possess the guts to vote their convictions.
As my friend Kit says, the Dems are all suck and no swallow.
Linked@Jay's and XPOSTED@Real Teen's.
Over at the Pile Of Shit, or the Daily POS as some know it by, was this "gem" of wrong-headed analysis.
The latest incarnation of the New McCarthyism, the ugly Duncan Hunter stunt - the so-called "Murtha" resolution - blew up in their face.
The NYTimes reported that:
House Republicans are attempting to split the ranks of the Democrats tonight by offering a resolution to withdraw American troops from Iraq immediately.
The vote on the rule to bring the Fake Hunter Resolution to the floor for a vote passed 210-202, but every every Democratic representative who voted, voted against the rule and 5 Republicans joined the Democrats.
Obviously, the Republican attempt failed.
Here is why this shows, without one shred of doubt, why the poster, "armando" is a blathering moron with the IQ of a turnip.
The goal of this Resolution was to allow the Dems to follow through with all of the rhetoric they spew about "supporting the troops but not the war", to give them a chance to finally "put their money where their mouths are" so to speak. It was, after all, an idea thought up by a Democrat, (the withdrawal, not nailing the Dems to the door of the Capitol Building), and after months of hearing all of the BS from the left the GOP finally found their spine and called them on it.
The vote that Armando wrote about here was the vote to decide if the measure went to the floor for debate. Of course the Dems voted "NAY". They didn't want that Resolution on the floor for debate. They wanted that Resolution forgotten about. It made them look bad.
As well it should. When it came down to it even the Dems that stood up and said they would vote YEA on the Resolution voted Nay, as the progressive Black Caucus Chair swore he would vote to bring the troops home, and with his 43 members we see that he didn't get the job done, since the had a grand total of THREE YEA votes.
The Dems had two choices here if they didn't stop the Resolution from making it to the floor, which of course they didn't. Their two choices were, vote Yea on the Resolution, showing the world, their constituencies and most importantly the Military who the true cowards are, or vote Nay, making them appear strong on defense, but, more importantly finally giving the world solid proof that even though they say they are against the war, the Dems do NOT possess the guts to vote their convictions.
As my friend Kit says, the Dems are all suck and no swallow.
Linked@Jay's and XPOSTED@Real Teen's.
blog comments powered by Disqus