Kender Uncensored
Sitemeter
Contributors
Send Me $
Recent Comments
Top Commenters
The Imaginary Book
The Drunk Scotsman
The Scotsman
Uncle Kender
Favorites Buzz
-
-
What I'm Raeding Today14 years ago
-
-
.10 years ago
-
-
-
Those Whom The Gods Wish To Destroy ...7 years ago
-
If You Don't Change Your RSS Feed...14 years ago
-
-
Ministry11 years ago
-
Lacuna4 years ago
-
-
Petition to Stop Judicial Tyranny19 years ago
-
tazmedic12 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
America's New Diet15 years ago
-
Labels
- hate crimes (1)
- illegal immigration (1)
- May 1st march (1)
- muzzies (1)
- poetry (59)
- pork (1)
- stupid (1)
Gimme some love
Technorati
Warning Will Robinson!
Feel free to post comments, rants, or even personal attacks. It simply shows your wish for taunting if you do the latter.
You can say anything you want here. But if you get stupid I reserve the right to point it out, call you lots of inventive names and laugh like hell.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(371)
-
▼
September
(27)
- The ACLU, Protector or Enabler?
- How We can Save the Planet
- First, Gay Marriage.
- Remember Terri? Or, Remember Steven Hawking!!!
- I am a Large Mammal in the TTLB
- The Return of The Fairness Doctrine????
- More Love Not Lost Letters
- Cindy Got Arrested!!!
- CAIR and Kender...or "Love Not Lost Letters"
- Dear Grampa
- My Grampa
- Guard the Border Blogburst
- Why Bush Won't Secure the Border
- Just my .02 on Judicial Activism
- When The State Becomes God
- Some Thoughts On New Orleans
- I have haloscan...again
- Haloscan commenting and trackback have been added ...
- I Shall Not Cry!!!
- A Special Roundup of Things You Should Read!!!!
- A Letter To ACLU Members
- Let's Cut Through The Crap!!!!
- So Long Little Buddy!!!
- May I have your attention Please???
- Thoughts on Going "Home"
- I have a ton to say and no time to say it...
- Price Gouging Isn't Limited to the Gulf States
-
▼
September
(27)
Blogs I Like
In no particular order):
Note: "right" either means this blogger is correct or that they lean right. I know what I mean by it. How do you take it?
Note: "right" either means this blogger is correct or that they lean right. I know what I mean by it. How do you take it?
- RG in The Low Country!(Right)
- Mackers World(Right)
- Ric and Georgina at Release The Hounds!(Right)
- RN at Dead Republican Presidents!
(Right) - Kat, sometimes in pajamas!
- Madtom at ThisFuckingWar! (Right)
- Michael J. Totten sets things straight!(Right)
- Maxedoutmama is a research Goddess!(Right)
- Andrightlyso! smacks on idiots!(Right)
- Where's Your Brain?(Right)
- Warm'n'fuzzy conserva-puppies>(Right)
- Crymeariverbend2 has a gnarly truth stick!(Right)
- Jeffrey at IBC is HQ for Iraqi bloggings(Right)
- The Sandmonkey cuts through the APU!(Right)
- The Lone Ranger
A Man of Rare Integrity! (Right) - Out of the Ashes(Right)
- Tazmedic(Right) (Read the archives!)
- Amandarin(Right) (A clever friend from the other side of the street)
- Literal Lunacy
A Most Beloved Friend!
(Right)
The Other Side Of The Street
Iraqi Blogs
- Iraq the Model
- Ali returns!!!
- Raeds Place
(This is where I go when I want to piss off some insane "Unrealists". Thanks CMAR!) - Khalid Digging for Secrets!
- Kurdo's World
- Baghdad Burning
(The infamous, the mysterious, the mostly hysterical Riverbend!!!!)
101st Fighting Keyboardists
The Wide Awakes
First, Gay Marriage.
9/30/2005 |
Posted by
kender |
Edit Post
Then
Polygamy.
Another tip o' me tam for this story goes to Release the Hounds, (I should pay those folks for research huh?).
Here in America there is a saying, which is
and the reason this saying has come about is because California has a long history of passing legislation that the rest of the country seems to follow. A scary thought since California is home to San Francisco and Berkeley, both hotbeds of non-sensical liberalism.
People that have stood against gay marriage have stated, among many other arguments against it, that first it will be gay marriage, then polygamy.
Well, perhaps the new saying should be
as the Dutch government has granted a civil union to a man and two women.
As Ric over at RTH so succinctly puts it,
(BTW, Ric is NOT promoting gay marriage, though that short quote makes it sound as if he is...just want that clear)
Well, how about we throw this rule into marriage?
1) Marriage must be between two consenting human adults of legal age and not related closer than third cousins by blood.
You know why we can't toss this rule in there?
Because soemone, somewhere down the line, will say it tramples on their right to the pursuit of happiness.
The ACLU supports and fights for polygamy, among other things, and it begs the question, why does the ACLU, in so many cases, stand for the things that tear the very fabric of society?
If you think that this issue doesn't tear the fabric of society, consider the high rate of homosexual molestation in foster homes and that studies have shown that this indeed seems to be the case. This is pedophilia, and just to piss people off remember that many of the same people that fight gay marriage also fight gay adoption, and if you think that just because someone decides to adopt as opposed to being a foster parent means that the likelyhood of molestation will go down then eat some drano and get off of my planet.
The ACLU fights FOR gay marriage, polygamy, legalizing drugs and pedophiles.
These things are all interconnected, and there must be a balance of freedoms with the concerns for the safety of our society, especially the children. (can I say it's for the children? Or does the left own that term?)
This started out as a story on gay marriage, but as you can see it has become a post highlighting, (in a perfunctory way) the connection between the stances the ACLU defends and the danger we face if we don't stand up to these cretins.
Polygamy.
Another tip o' me tam for this story goes to Release the Hounds, (I should pay those folks for research huh?).
Here in America there is a saying, which is
"As California goes, so goes the nation"
and the reason this saying has come about is because California has a long history of passing legislation that the rest of the country seems to follow. A scary thought since California is home to San Francisco and Berkeley, both hotbeds of non-sensical liberalism.
People that have stood against gay marriage have stated, among many other arguments against it, that first it will be gay marriage, then polygamy.
Well, perhaps the new saying should be
"As go the Dutch, so goes the world"
as the Dutch government has granted a civil union to a man and two women.
As Ric over at RTH so succinctly puts it,
"if two people love each other and want to have their commitment recognized through marriage, society has no compelling reason to prevent them from doing so, on what basis could you prevent adult siblings, parents and children or three of more persons from "marrying" each other."
(BTW, Ric is NOT promoting gay marriage, though that short quote makes it sound as if he is...just want that clear)
Well, how about we throw this rule into marriage?
1) Marriage must be between two consenting human adults of legal age and not related closer than third cousins by blood.
You know why we can't toss this rule in there?
Because soemone, somewhere down the line, will say it tramples on their right to the pursuit of happiness.
The ACLU supports and fights for polygamy, among other things, and it begs the question, why does the ACLU, in so many cases, stand for the things that tear the very fabric of society?
If you think that this issue doesn't tear the fabric of society, consider the high rate of homosexual molestation in foster homes and that studies have shown that this indeed seems to be the case. This is pedophilia, and just to piss people off remember that many of the same people that fight gay marriage also fight gay adoption, and if you think that just because someone decides to adopt as opposed to being a foster parent means that the likelyhood of molestation will go down then eat some drano and get off of my planet.
The ACLU fights FOR gay marriage, polygamy, legalizing drugs and pedophiles.
These things are all interconnected, and there must be a balance of freedoms with the concerns for the safety of our society, especially the children. (can I say it's for the children? Or does the left own that term?)
This started out as a story on gay marriage, but as you can see it has become a post highlighting, (in a perfunctory way) the connection between the stances the ACLU defends and the danger we face if we don't stand up to these cretins.
blog comments powered by Disqus